Salta al contenuto principale


Lemmy AMA March 2025


in reply to Nutomic

We are seeing an influx of new users, but what's happening to older users? Are they still active? What's the average lifetime of Lemmy users nowadays?
I'm kinda curious about the user retention in general
in reply to totallyNotARedditor

Every server and community has monthly active users stats. Best way to see them would be a tool like this that keeps track of history: lemmy.fediverse.observer/stats

We don't do any tracking of user retention, but overall lemmy has been fairly steady at ~50k users for a year now.

in reply to totallyNotARedditor

I believe they are still active. User numbers have been stable for a long time, and there are some names that I recognize from the very early days 5 years ago.
in reply to Nutomic

Hello,

Thank you for organizing this AMA!

Starting with a quite expected question: when do you think you'll be able to release Lemmy 1.0?

in reply to Blaze (he/him)

With the rate ppl are adding issues (and we're finding more), is sometimes feels like it keeps getting farther away than nearer, but we'll get there in some months.
in reply to Blaze (he/him)

Its hard to say because these things always take longer than expected. Now we are finally getting to the point where all the breaking database and api changes are almost finished. After that it will take some months to update lemmy-ui for all the backend changes and new features, and the same for all other apps. Then a testing period to fix all the problems that come up. So maybe around autumn for the final release, although lemmy.ml and some other instances may upgrade some months before already.
in reply to Nutomic

Some Lemmy clients offer the option to auto-hide posts and comments which contain certain keywords of the choice of the user. Are there any plans to implement this feature into the stock Lemmy experience?

I know it is possible to do some hacky stuff with UblockOrigin to do the same, but that is not something most know about and are willing to do.

in reply to prototype_g2

This is currently work in progress.
in reply to Nutomic

Is there a way to move myself as an user from one server to another?
in reply to murd0x

You can export your settings, community follows etc and import them in another instance. Moving your existing posts and comments doesnt work well with federation.
in reply to Nutomic

Not really a question, but something to think about is being more strict about backwards compatibility so that people don't get burnt out on having stuff break. Coming from this post by the Tesseract dev, who did not like the breaking changes to the v3 API in 1.0: dubvee.org/post/2904152

To formulate that into an actual question, do you think the changes are still worth it and you'd make the same decision to break backwards compatibility?

in reply to m_‮f

This is all a matter of dev resources. If we had maybe 6 full-time devs, we could handle things like backwards compatibility.

People forget that lemmy, like other open source hobby projects, don't have the resources that large corporations do. People understandably get frustrated when there's breaking changes, but they also need to not put enterprise-level expectations on a small number of people.

If someone wanted to work on that, of course we wouldn't be opposed, but you should know how monumental a task that would be.

in reply to m_‮f

in reply to Nutomic

What’s something you wish it had? What can our community do to ensure that we keep pulling users away from US tech companies, and into the fediverse?


One of the biggest issue at this point is probably the registration experience. There are quite a few occurrences on !fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com of users not sure whether their email has been validated or not, and at the moment they really need to look out for the toastify notification on their first try, later attempts won't show it.

Most recent example: lemmy.ml/post/27607055?scrollT…

If there could be a way to inform a user saying "your email address has been validated, please wait for an administrator to activate your account, you can reach out to them at xxx", that would be great.

in reply to Blaze (he/him)

I'd need more detail here. If registration emails aren't being sent out correctly, we need to handle that.
in reply to Blaze (he/him)

Youre right, I also noticed some other problems while testing registrations:
- github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issu…
- github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issu…
in reply to Nutomic

What are your thoughts on blocking AI scraper access? Any attempts to improve that on the side of Lemmy? Basic things like allowing to customize the robots.txt easily would already help.

I also recently tried this new AI block tool called Anubis with Lemmy, but for some reason it fails with Lemmy-ui. Might be interesting to investigate further.

in reply to poVoq

You can load a different robots.txt in your nginx config, something like this:
location /robotx.txt {
    index /path/to/my/robots.txt;
}

Additionally 1.0 will change the "private instance" to work with federation enabled (see github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull…). Then only logged-in users will see content, while AI scrapers wont see anything except the login page.
in reply to Nutomic

in reply to GnuLinuxDude

There's some discussion of this here. It's not something I care too much about, but anyone is free to add more detailed URLs to either lemmy-ui or other front-ends.

Its been years but no one has found it important enough to them to work on.

in reply to GnuLinuxDude

Questa voce è stata modificata (9 mesi fa)
in reply to m-p{3}

Protocol handlers are the way to go IMO. I've opened an issue based on @phiresky's comment.
in reply to m-p{3}

Potentially, using some sort of predictable hashing to get the same id across instances might also help in the detection of duplicate links so that they can be aggregated in a single place (sort of what was suggested at point 2 here).

I fear this could be too much of a breaking change though.

Questa voce è stata modificata (9 mesi fa)
in reply to Ferk

We won't add UUIDs or any "universal" sort of identifier, but universal links are still possible without them.
in reply to Nutomic

How is it some can mod 15+ comms, like this awful character PugJesus , ban anyone for no reason and then comment stuff like this without consequence:

Be less of a dick.
Be less of a moron.
in reply to Bloomcole

Im not familiar with that user, turns out he is already banned from lemmy.ml and many other instances. So there are consequences, but as long as lemmy.world admins are okay with him, he can keep posting there. This is a big benefit of Lemmy's federation compared to Reddit: even if theres a user you dislike, you can join an instance where he is completely insivible, while you can still interact with other users in the network. There is no single person or organization that can decide who can or cannot post on Lemmy, every instance decides for itself.
in reply to Nutomic

  1. What is your opinion on Bluesky being more popular than Mastodone because it is easier for most?
  2. Will Lemmy can become easy like Bluesky? Are there plans like that?

thanks

edit: lemmy dev replies only please

Questa voce è stata modificata (9 mesi fa)
in reply to Itte

Afaik Bluesky is a for-profit company with millions in budget and probably a dozen or more fulltime employees. Of course they have much more resources to polish the new user experience, and also have an actual marketing budget. Plus in practice its completely centralized, they dont need to worry about all the difficulties that federation brings. Its only natural that they are more successful than Mastodon in the short term. But sooner or later they will also have problems when the Bluesky admins make decisions that the community doesnt like, and then there may be another migration wave to the Fediverse.

For the same reasons mentioned above, Lemmy cant become as easy as Bluesky. But the more contributors and donors we have, the closer we can get.

in reply to Nutomic

thanks . can I ask one more question? what should we be excited for in lemmy 1.0 (for non technical users)?
in reply to Itte

Lots of new features, so many that its hard to keep track of all. The biggest one might be private communities, where only users approved by moderators can browse and post.
in reply to Itte

What is your opinion on Bluesky being more popular than Mastodone because it is easier for most?


It shows only that like most open source tools, US media institutes a general conspiracy of silence about platforms like the fediverse, and mastodon (or lemmy). Not because they're not user-friendly enough, but because ultimately it's not something the US can control. Bluesky is really just a rebranded twitter, founded by the same people, but with owners more friendly to the US democratic party, as opposed to musk who is more friendly to republicans. Both are US corporations subject to its laws and beholden to push pro-US foreign policy lines.

I hope most of the world will choose to escape all these monopolistic US-controlled platforms, and for countries to fund open source, and encourage their own citizens to use community-run alternatives.

Lemmy won't become bluesky, because we're a community/topic-focused link aggregator, not a person-focused microblogging platform.

in reply to Itte

Will Lemmy can become easy like Bluesky? Are there plans like that?


I'm not a Lemmy dev (well I've made a couple of small commits lol), but this type of question can be hard to answer from the inside of a project.

It would probably be easier to answer a question more like: "Do you plan to implement feature XYZ in order to be easier to use like Bluesky?"

in reply to Die4Ever

Its interesting to have some more general questions, not only about specific features which can be answered with a simple Github link :)
in reply to Nutomic

Questa voce è stata modificata (9 mesi fa)
in reply to Zagorath

Regarding the markdown point for lemmy-ui, I think part of the issue is that we don't use a markdown parser tailored to our purposes. We use markdown-it, and our custom (non-common mark, so stuff like the spoiler blocks) stuff uses plugins for it like this one. One of these days I'd like to make a markdown parser specifically for Lemmy.
in reply to Sleepless One

The plugin architecture for markdown makes a lot of sense, because it allows other projects to mix and match markdown rules for their specific use case. I also used some of your Rust markdown plugins for Ibis.
in reply to Zagorath

All these are due to a lack of developers for open source in general. Jerboa needs more devs than just me and @MV-GH, but no one else has stepped up to take on fixing any of these. If there were 5 more of me, I could get these done, but I'm too busy.
in reply to Nutomic

in reply to ex_06

There's a forum sort called NewComments, that servers and any user can use to turn lemmy into a forum-style feed.

Instances can already disable downvotes site-wide, but we also already have fine-grained vote display settings:

Merging communities is no more possible than merging mastodon users.

Which mod tools do we need?

We already have RSS feeds.

We already have the ability to save posts and comments.

Word filters and flairs are in the works.

There's too many other things here for me to answer.

in reply to ex_06

in reply to Nutomic

+1 on registration experience being the #1 issue.

Would also be cool if we could stop 404/500ing deleted posts and instead display some indication it has been deleted. See en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princi…

Thanks for Lemmy! 💙

in reply to gazby

We have gone back and forth a few times on how deleted content is returned by the API, its very tricky to get right.
in reply to Nutomic

What's the vision for using lemmy? User should create an account on one server, and use all? Or should create users on multiple servers? The first one seems like the way to go, but it wasn't quite clear for me when I signed up
in reply to Dessalines

This only states the multiple ways of how one can use lemmy, but neither envisions how one should use it. And vision is important for the non technical user, especially when exploring new grounds, because vision makes him go further. Not infinite overwhelming possibilities, technicalities and potential headaches.
It's simple or it's complicated.
in reply to murd0x

I still don't follow you. In the very first link, we direct people a page that lets them explore or join a server. You don't need to know anything about federation to use lemmy.
in reply to Nutomic

in reply to BeNotAfraid

Any possibility for hash tags to be added? Cross instance topics would be so much easier to browse especially when similar topics are discussed across different community names across difference instances.

I'd like to be able to browse the federation for tv show discussion with #tvshows or #fringe or something

in reply to krolden

@phiresky is in the process of adding post tags: github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull…
in reply to BeNotAfraid

in reply to Nutomic

Random general question, how do you feel about file hosting? When posting, I tend to avoid uploading media larger than like, 5MB, just cause I know that the cost of storing said media can get exorbitant very quickly and I wouldn't want to be part of the burden.. I'm not able to donate just yet. Knowing this, I am currently on the fence on whether I should create a "gaming clips" community.

That said, it's nice to be able to embed media from other sources (despite it potentially not working natively for mobile platforms if I'm not mistaken?), which got me thinking: it'd be nice to have some sort of preference list of image/video hosting hosts that users can add to or remove from, and uploading directly from the comment/create post view would use the first working file hosting domain from the list.. Just spitballing here.

in reply to uberstar

The upload function is mainly meant for images, like others said its better to use external sites for video uploads. Integrating upload to those remote sites seems like a lot of work for little benefit though.
in reply to uberstar

join-lemmy.org/docs/users/02-m…

Torrents should be used, as it entirely solves the static data distribution problem, and keeps servers from having to shoulder potentially enormous hosting costs.

I've even added a lot of torrent-support related features to lemmy-ui and jerboa, that will come in 1.0

in reply to Nutomic

Communities should be more unified across servers, especially for niche ones. I want to see an active Metroid community, I don't give a crap what instance is hosting it (or if it's a mostly-opaque medley of instances) so long as I'm federated with it. This is probably the biggest UX misunderstanding new users have.
in reply to jsomae

This should be among the first priorities. It would really help kick things off. Not only niche communities, but bigger ones as well. They represent topics of interest.
I think I've seen a thing like macro community in one of the clients?! Could that be it?
in reply to murd0x

How would two communities named news, work for say, a server about star trek, and another located in a city.
in reply to jsomae

Having distinct communities is a feature, not a bug. If two cities set up their own lemmy instances, say lemmy.sao_luis.br, and lemmy.lagos.ng, they can each have a news community, without them overlapping.

Do a search for metroid, and subscribe to whichever ones you like.

in reply to Dessalines

Look, this is just my take -- I think this is bad UX. I'm not saying federation isn't a good idea -- on the contrary, I like the idea that many different posts in the same community are all hosted on different instances. Sure, for a community like news it doesn't make as much sense -- fixes for this would be that some communities don't have the behaviour I'm suggesting, or the convention is to call it sao_luis_news or something.
Questa voce è stata modificata (9 mesi fa)
in reply to Nutomic

When a instance goes permanently offline, does the content vanish? If so, could there possibly be a way for another instance to "adopt" the content on their instance so those posts aren't lost to time?

I think it might help reassure people to pick smaller instances.

in reply to UltraGiGaGigantic

It can't be transferred, but the posts / content will never vanish. Most importantly, it will stay searcheable.

The best option is just to create another community on a living server, and link to the local version of a dead one in a sidebar.

in reply to UltraGiGaGigantic

Edit: I suppose I shouldn't be answering this. Kinda forgot the thread I'm in. I guess I asked something as well.


If your instance was federated with it when it existed then your instance automatically has its own backup of it is as far as I understand things. I would like clarity on this however. My instance is a few days older than this account. Therefore the smaller instances that have already died are already duplicated locally here at sh.itjust.works. I can still view vlemmy, waveform.social, lemmy.film, (etc.) communities/posts as essentially an archive.

What I'd like to know is if I linked a sh.itjust.works link to one of those threads could a user of a more recent instance load the content?

I'm not sure what point it would ultimately serve as with the host instance being offline nothing could federate out between us anyway.

Questa voce è stata modificata (9 mesi fa)
in reply to trashcan

This, content is already mirrored to federated instances and stored forever (though media may not be included).

What I’d like to know is if I linked a sh.itjust.works link to one of those threads could a user of a more recent instance load the content?


Lemmy only loads content from the original instance where it was created, otherwise it would be possible to impersonate users. So it is not possible to load that.

in reply to Nutomic

Coming from Reddit I feel Lemmy could use a way to sort posts within communities by top posts within a time frame we choose. That without this feature gamers and gooners will default to reddit over Lemmy.
in reply to Mallspice

I added a more flexible time-frame filter to lemmy that will come in 1.0.0 .
in reply to Nutomic

Do you feel a recommendation algorithm of some sorts is something lemmy will need for bigger audiences?
in reply to lorty

Lemmy already uses recommendation algorithms for most of its sorts.

As far as a "personalized" one that isn't the communities you explicitly subscribed to, I don't think its really necessary, but it wouldn't be impossible to add (someone could probably come up with some good adjacent-community queries based on the most partipipated communities of users who you've liked comments and posts of. Make an issue for this on the lemmy github if you would like.

in reply to Nutomic

  • Will there be any way to block users from certain instances to hide their comments?
  • What are the plans the improve discoverability?

I'm quite discontent with how few options there is to explore Lemmy. And it doesn't helps that the top posts are always related to politics.

  • Will there be any type of word filtering?

We should have community unifying.

  • I know people have already said it many times, but the joining experience could be simpler and less confusing.
in reply to P4ulin_Kbana

Will there be any way to block users from certain instances to hide their comments?


I dont think theres an issue for this yet, feel free to open one. It could be a checkbox for "Blocked Instances" setting, eg "Also block users".

What are the plans the improve discoverability?


There is an issue for easier discovery of federated communities which is part of our roadmap. Piefed recently implemented a similar feature which we will take inspiration from. It also helps if you block communities that you dont want to see. Are there any other ideas you are thinking of?

Will there be any type of word filtering?


This is work in progress.

in reply to Nutomic

More customization for site owners. I have an independent instance and there's a lot of things on there that are confusing for people unfamiliar with the fefiverse or lemmy. It would also be nice to remove the donation beg at the top. I know Lemmy needs funding, but it makes it look like I'm asking for donations.
in reply to GrumpyDuckling

The easiest solution would be to mention in the sidebar or in a welcome post that donations are not for you, but for the developers of the software. Also the frontend supports custom css so you can change the entire design. It is also possible to use a different frontend or write your own, as its all open source.

To be honest its quite bold of you asking to remove the donation buttons. Working on Lemmy has been our fulltime job for the past years, and we rely on user donations to pay for food and rent. Yet you are getting the results of our work entirely for free. Having some donation links is a very small price for that.

in reply to Nutomic

Indeed it is a big ask, however, It would be something I'd be willing to pay for. Many foss projects make money from paying customers as well as donations. I also mention and explain what lemmy is and encourage people to check it out in the getting started area of the site.
in reply to GrumpyDuckling

How much would you be willing to pay for this? Im not sure if its worth the effort because its not clear if anyone else besides you would be interested, and it would require a bunch of work to setup. It would require an automated way to check donation status, and a way to build and distribute these private releases. Feel free to respond via private message.
in reply to Nutomic

I guess I wasn't thinking about how much work it would actually be in order to enforce it. I doubt I could afford the cost. Maybe if it was coupled with a managed services type of deal and you had enough subsrcibers it could be enough to hire another staff member? It seems like adding "premium" features could alieanate the userbase unless it's just cosmetic changes.
I put my foot in my mouth bringing it up, sorry.
in reply to GrumpyDuckling

No worries that's what the AMA is for. I thought about managed hosting before, but it would likely involve mainly support and sysadmin work, while my passion is programming.
in reply to Nutomic

You could always outsource and automate the basic troubleshooting aspects. Running updates accross multiple customers would be a breeze. I beleive I've seen one managed services company that will set up an instance and manage it for around $20/mo.
in reply to GrumpyDuckling

That would mean hiring someone, which requires initial funding like a bank loan. It is also necessary to get the funding and skill to setup a website, automate the hosting and most importantly run a marketing campaign. Otherwise no one will know about the service nor use it. So it requires setting up a whole business, do you know how to do that?
in reply to Nutomic

Do you plan on moving away from GitHub to something else like Forgejo?
in reply to asudox

Once its mature, I personally wouldn't be opposed to moving issue tracking off github and into a federated one like forgejo.
in reply to Nutomic

Do you have any plans to make it easier to manage the images stored in pictrs? One issue I have is that I used to proxy images, I no longer do that, but now I have like 300GB on backblaze doing nothing. In this post I outlined more precisely what I mean.
in reply to Lena

This is something which should be handled by external tools, for example lemmy-thumbnail-cleaner.
in reply to Nutomic

I am new to Lemmy, so haven’t really looked into if the following is possible but can I create groups of communities with a similar topic across multiple instances?
in reply to Nutomic

Do you plan to introduce some kind of post tags into Lemmy, preferably something that will behave like Hashtags on Mastodon and other activitypub platforms? I know that Lemmy has been embedding community name as a hashtag for a while now, though having tags that can be populated by users would help discovery greatly.
in reply to Draconic NEO

Lemmy is not for microblogging, so I dont think hashtags make sense.
in reply to Nutomic

Well they don't have to show up as hashtags to users on Lemmy, they can show up as their own designated tags you add to the post on creation of editing. Just some form of post tags to indicate the category of a post (could even be specific to communities like subreddit flairs) but they would show up as hashtags on Mastodon, similar to how Lemmy already embeds a hashtag of the community into posts.
in reply to Draconic NEO

Ah, post tags are currently work in progress. They are also going to be federated.
in reply to Nutomic

Thanks a lot for the work you do! How do you get by with such a limited amount of funds? How sustainable is your financial situation if donations don't pick up considerably?
in reply to diamat

I live in Spain, the cost of living here is much cheaper than Germany or especially the United States. I also dont need luxuries, and have enough money saved to last for a while. If donations are not enough I could always work for some company, and spend less time on Lemmy.
in reply to Nutomic

Parola filtrata: nsfw

in reply to abobla

You can put spoilers in the body

::: spoiler spoiler
Helloooo
:::

in reply to morrowind

but then the user might not realize that there's an image in the post, which will also limit it's reach.
in reply to abobla

So a spoiler tag for post links? This could potentially be added later as an addition to the post tags feature.
in reply to Nutomic

I see. Would the spoiler tag also blur the thumbnail?

The only thing that concerns me about handling spoilers is how the third party apps handle them. Do you think it would be a good idea to also blur the entire image (not only the thumbnail) and remove the blur only when the user clicks the image?

in reply to abobla

Not sure, we would have to see whenever we get around to implementing that.
in reply to Nutomic

Even that isn't too necessary, since you can already put images in spoiler markdown blocks.
in reply to abobla

You can hide images behind spoiler tags also:

::: spoiler check it out

:::

Unknown parent

lemmy - Collegamento all'originale
Dessalines
Open up an issue on their repo.
in reply to Nutomic

From my perspective we need better Mod and Admin tools. Forum software has a lot of them but Lemmy is lacking in this department.

The key important one is being able to move posts to different communities. You'll often get reports of posts not being appropriate for a community but there is no way to actually move it.

in reply to ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝

There was some discussion of this not long ago: feddit.uk/post/24412286

@nutomic@lemmy.ml linked this GitHub issue: github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issu…

Questa voce è stata modificata (9 mesi fa)
in reply to Rogue

It shouldn't be too difficult. A move is essentially a cross-post but it keeps the OP as the poster (rather than the cross-poster). You'd then want to lock the original post, and either hide it or add a message directing people to the new post. That's all current forum software does.
in reply to ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝

The main question is how this can work in terms of federation. When creating a new post it directly references the community url. If the user and community are on different instances then the community instance cannot rewrite the post to reference a different community. So it would have to tell the post creator to (automatically) resubmit the post to the new community. Same for all comments, they would have to be recreated by the respective author's instance in the new post. Seems quite complex to implement.
in reply to ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝

Which tools specifically? I ask because this is a common complaint, but 99% of the time its something we already have, that most ppl are unaware of.

The key important one is being able to move posts to different communities.


Lemmy like all federated services, can't rewrite history, but you can already cross-post. It would just take someone adding that as an issue to lemmy-ui and working on it.

in reply to Dessalines

Which tools specifically?


Standard Web forum tools include:

  • Editing posts - the main issue is misleading titles
  • Moving posts to different communities
  • Merging posts
  • Splitting comments into separate posts
  • IP check

This post makes some good points about reports federating (being worked on, I believe) but also about the lack of what we'll call a "moderation panel" where you can access tools for the community, like seeing a list of banned users and being able to add to it there or unban someone.

There are other "nice to have" tools like post approval

I am curious to see what moderation tools PieFed, has and NodeBB now they are federated, but the documentation is skimpy on that front.

in reply to ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝

Editing posts - the main issue is misleading titles
Moving posts to different communities


You can read over the discussion here, but we will never allow mods or admins to act as / impersonate users, or edit their content.

We also can't rewrite history in the fediverse (unlike a forum) so "moving" a post would also entail deleting and recreating content other people made.

Splitting comments into separate posts
Merging posts


These ones sound really strange, but its similar, I don't want mods to be able to rewrite user history or move it.

IP check


We don't store IPs so that'd be impossible.

in reply to Dessalines

You can read over the discussion here, but we will never allow mods or admins to act as / impersonate users, or edit their content.


I really don't get this. Why is editing user content with slur_filter or modifying URLs accepted but allowing mods/admins to change the NSFW toggle isn't? It also ignores that savvy-enough admins can edit user content with SQL queries.

Questa voce è stata modificata (8 mesi fa)
in reply to flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)

I think slur filters, tracking param removals, and local link rewriting are acceptable, because (with the exception of the slur filter) they're non-moderation actions, and also applied uniformly regardless of who made them.

It also ignores that savvy-enough admins can edit user content with SQL queries.


That's unavoidable of course, anyone with DB access ultimately can edit things. But if people catch on, I doubt your server would gain many users or last that long. Most importantly, we shouldn't allow that to happen via the API.

You're free to start a "Should mods be able to edit user's data?" discussion, but I doubt it would get much support, especially from reddit allowing this and it souring everyone to it.

in reply to Dessalines

Most importantly, we shouldn’t allow that to happen via the API.


My view is that not adding this to the API will only encourage admins who want this to do it through less transparent means, like injecting fake activities into the sent_activity table. Most admins are reasonable people, and have good relations with their users, so if admins explained themselves then I think most users would be pretty accepting.

You’re free to start a “Should mods be able to edit user’s data?” discussion, but I doubt it would get much support, especially from reddit allowing this and it souring everyone to it.


I mean there's been like 3 or 4 GitHub issues opened about this, so there's clearly some demand for it. Should I make a post in !lemmy@lemmy.ml? So users not on GitHub can chime in.

Questa voce è stata modificata (8 mesi fa)
in reply to Dessalines

Which tools specifically? I ask because this is a common complaint, but 99% of the time its something we already have, that most ppl are unaware of.


  • mod mail, so that users can reach out to the whole mod team at once, and the team can come back to them
  • a more structured mod queue, allowing to filter by community. The Reddit one on old.reddit was good to help keep an overview on the mod actions to take
in reply to Blaze (he/him)

more structured mod queue, allowing to filter by community


The upcoming combined modlog has this, as well as other more detailed filters.

You can read through these issues related to modmail, but the short version is that it's way out of scope for us, and not something we have time to do. Replicating private group chats is better done by other services like matrix, or using a shared email inbox.

Questo sito web utilizza cookie tecnici e di sessione. Proseguendo la navigazione su questo sito, accetti l'utilizzo dei cookie.