Salta al contenuto principale


Launch of Social Web Foundation


Leaders of the open social networking movement have formed the Social Web Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to making connections between social platforms with the open standard protocol ActivityPub. The “social web”, also called the “Fedive

reshared this

in reply to Evan Prodromou

re: Leaders of the open social networking movement have formed the Social Web Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to making connections between social platforms with the open standard protocol ActivityPub. The “social web”, also called the “Fe
i think you got ur content warning wrong. also, fyi, you don't need to add links to users profile when you tag them in a post, adding links is usually pretty annoying because then it opens in a remote instance on most software
in reply to Matthias Pfefferle

Not even Evan Prodromou can post on this platform without people jumping in to explain to him how he's doing it wrong. Amazing.
@pfefferle @yukijoou
in reply to yuki - queen of the snow

what platform are you on? is it using the old mastodon way: simply use the summary as warning, without checking for the sensitive flag? docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/act…
in reply to Matthias Pfefferle

@Matthias Pfefferle @yuki - queen of the snow

I notice that when I (on Friendica) respond to a Mastodon post with a content warning, I get an <abstract> element, and it certainly doesn't act as a content warning. So there seems to be some inconsistency in implementation.

That said, I'm not getting a content warning from this post.

in reply to Martijn Vos

mastodon uses `as:sensitive` to check if the summary is a summary or a content warning. docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/act…

I really like the idea of the sensitive flag, because to use the summary as a synonym for content-warning harms the spec.

Maybe we have to file some issue!?!

in reply to Matthias Pfefferle

or maybe it is because the WordPress plugin does not send an `as:sensitive: false` yet. we have a PR for that, I will try to release a new version to see if this will fix it. github.com/Automattic/wordpres…

can I maybe ping you two, to run a test on your instances @mcv @yukijoou ?

Questa voce è stata modificata (1 anno fa)
in reply to Matthias Pfefferle

@Matthias Pfefferle @yuki - queen of the snow

A sensitive flag sounds like a great idea, but repurposing a summary as content warning based on a flag sounds like a bad idea to me. If there's no explicit content warning field, I think a spoiler tag is a better fit, because that already functions similarly without the flag.

But I'd prefer an explicit content warning field. There's clearly a need for it, and if it's explicit, you could set your client to always show or hide certain content.

Questo sito web utilizza cookie tecnici e di sessione. Proseguendo la navigazione su questo sito, accetti l'utilizzo dei cookie.